Comments for

Comment on Finding Love in the Right Places by Stephen Grossman

Stephen Grossman — Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:31:00 +0000

>Harriman’s brilliant work is destined to be the fountainhead of future studies in the philosophy of science.”

The fountainhead, no less!

Comment on The Logical Leap Goes to College by Alexander7

Alexander7 — Sun, 24 Jul 2011 21:03:35 +0000

buy@generic.LEVITRA” rel=”nofollow”>……

Need cheap generic LEVITRA?…

Comment on Is My Account of History “Unconventional”? by Alexander7

Alexander7 — Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:53:45 +0000

buy@generic.LEVITRA” rel=”nofollow”>……

Need cheap generic LEVITRA?…

Comment on Welcome to The Logical Leap by Alexander7

Alexander7 — Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:05:29 +0000

buy@generic.LEVITRA” rel=”nofollow”>……

Need cheap generic LEVITRA?…

Comment on Keep the Baby, Throw out the Bathwater by Alexander7

Alexander7 — Wed, 20 Jul 2011 04:35:39 +0000

buy@generic.LEVITRA” rel=”nofollow”>……

Need cheap generic LEVITRA?…

Comment on In Defense of Galileo and Newton by Alexander7

Alexander7 — Sun, 17 Jul 2011 14:19:06 +0000

buy@generic.LEVITRA” rel=”nofollow”>……

Need cheap generic LEVITRA?…

Comment on Keep the Baby, Throw out the Bathwater by Alexander6

Alexander6 — Fri, 15 Jul 2011 22:55:00 +0000

buy@generic.VIAGRA” rel=”nofollow”>……

Need cheap generic VIAGRA?…

Comment on In Defense of Galileo and Newton by Alexander4

Alexander4 — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 02:16:09 +0000

buy@generic.abana” rel=”nofollow”>……

Need cheap generic ABANA?…

Comment on In Defense of Galileo and Newton by Keith Sketchley

Keith Sketchley — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:23:44 +0000

Now there’s supposedly something called “post-normal science”, which sounds like more of the nonsense described and rebutted in the book Higher Superstition: the academic left and its quarrels with science”.
See use of post-normal to justify climate alarmism in the philosophy of science page http://c21.phas.ubc.ca/article/true-false-or-not-sure-philosophy-science-21st-century which refers to S. O. Funtawicz and J. R. Ravetz, “Science for a post-normal age”, Futures 25 (2009) 739-755 for a description of what it is.

(Not covered in the book Higher Superstition, which is several years old. That book is exhaustive but has zingers and many good rebuttal points such as, in my hypothetical words, “If a female scientist discovers a cure for cancer, does [the theory being critiqued] mean it won’t work for males?”)

Comment on The Logical Leap Goes to College by Stephen Grossman

Stephen Grossman — Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:32:20 +0000

I listened to skeptical philosophy profs for four years. And, while I enjoyed showing a rational alternative to them, I’m jealous of the students who will study your book.